No contact until she is 18; Police says: evidential threshold not reached

Hi

I have received a report today. The Doncaster Council are asking the judge to:

1) extend the non-molestation order against me until 2021

2) extend the no contact order until 2021

3) make an order that I cannot make any applications to court in respect of my daughter until 2021.

This cuts me totally out of my daughter’s life until she is 18. She is now showing serious signs of distress including soiling at night which she has never done.

She is scared of being taken by me as it is ‘against the rules’ (her words) and I would go to prison.

The social services are desperate to cover their criminal acts by making me out to be a crazed mother, when I have done no wrong at all and am actually calmer now than my distress since she was taken last January.

They have a child on their hands that needs psychiatric help but they are ignoring her obvious mental trauma from being separated from her mother.

They continue to protect the father to then protect their house of cards.

Sick?

You bet

Vicky

Furthermore, here are quotes from Doncaster Police:

The mistreatment alleged against DT by VH and RHT was not forwarded to CPS for consultation as the evidential threshold had not been met.  Despite  diligent investigation by South Yorkshire Police,  no independent corroborative evidence of the allegations, be that medical, forensic, witness or otherwise, was obtained.

As you are aware for a case to be successful at a criminal court the evidence has to be beyond reasonable doubt as opposed to that of the family/civil courts which is balance of probabilities.

I.e. according to this Police Officer, the evidence of the girl is “not enough” to prosecute her father in a criminal court. At the same time, the mother in a Family Court is assumed to be guilty of “emotional abuse” based on the ‘balance of probabilities’.

In this Court of Public Opinion, please do make up your own mind and choose your level of support.

For more information, please email sabine AT 3d-metrics.com.

Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Family Courts, Paedophiles, Sexual abuse and tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to No contact until she is 18; Police says: evidential threshold not reached

  1. Pingback: Vicky sacks the “guardian” of her daughter; we need “McKenzie Angels” as “Public Guardian Angels” « Vicky Haigh: requesting her daughter to return

  2. Pingback: Ending the tyranny of Secret Family Courts and Social Care « Vicky Haigh: requesting her daughter to return

  3. Pingback: Tomorrow: Court 45 for Vicky Haigh and Court 34 for Liz Watson « Vicky Haigh: requesting her daughter to return

  4. annie says:

    I posted similar elsewhere on this site and subject. You have got to get a top privately funded family law barrister. So just in case you miss my other posting I post here.

    I previously provided Sabine the name of a top private family law barrister I have used in my own case not dissimilar to Vicky’s.

    Having gone through previous legal aid solicitor’s/barristers, none would “get a grip of the case” and I my exhusband with police/masonic contacts ended with our two children despite my originally being granted an uncontested Full Residence Order of two children a year earlier.

    But all this changed when my ex lost a Financial Hearing which happened after I had custody of the children. Then the malicious allegations started, and within 12 months the children were taken from my care.

    3 years later they were returned, but only after I employed private solicitor and barrister and did away with rubbish legal aid. When this top London barrister took one look at my case, he immediately apologised on behalf of his profession for what had happened to me, that should never have happened.

    I got Justice, and my two children now live with me. But you will not get your daughter back without an expensive, privately funded legal battle, which if you are already paying privately, I advise you change your barrister with immediate effect, and go and see the barrister i used.

    He does Judicial Reviews and was seeking one in my case. The Judge immediately retired!!!!!!

    Please dont give up and do please get in touch for the name of the barrister I used in London. Top family Law barrister who will get justice for mothers like me and will do for Vicky. Best wishes

    If anyone reads this post, and Vicky doesnt, will someone please let her know of this as I don’t know how else to get this message to her. Thanks

  5. Jamie says:

    Why Carry a Gun?

    My old Grandpa said to me, ‘Son, there comes a time in every man’s life when he stops bustin’ knuckles and starts bustin’ caps and usually it’s when he becomes too old to take a whoopin’.

    I don’t carry a gun to kill people; I carry a gun to keep from being killed.

    I don’t carry a gun because I’m evil; I carry a gun because I have lived long enough to see the evil in the World.

    I don’t carry a gun because I hate the government; I carry a gun because I understand the limitations of government.

    I don’t carry a gun because I’m angry; I carry a gun so that I don’t have to spend the rest of my life hating myself for failing to be prepared.

    I don’t carry a gun because I want to shoot someone; I carry a gun because I want to die at a ripe old age in my bed and not on a sidewalk somewhere tomorrow afternoon.

    I don’t carry a gun to make me feel like a man; I carry a gun because men know how to take care of themselves and the ones they love.

    I don’t carry a gun because I feel inadequate; I carry a gun because unarmed and facing three armed thugs, I am inadequate.

    I don’t carry a gun because I love it; I carry a gun because I love life and the people who make it meaningful to me.

    Police protection is an oxymoron: Free citizens must protect themselves because police do not protect you from crime; they just investigate the crime after it happens and then call someone in to clean up the mess.

    Personally, I carry a gun because I’m too young to die and too old to take a whoopin’!

    A LITTLE GUN HISTORY

    PLEASE DON’T THINK FOR A MOMENT, THAT THIS COULDN’T HAPPEN IN OUR COUNTRY ALSO !!!!!!

    In 1929, the Soviet Union established gun control:

    From 1929 to 1953, about 20 million dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    ———————–
    In 1911, Turkey established gun control:

    From 1915 to 1917, 1.5 million Armenians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    ———————–
    Germany established gun control in 1938:

    From 1939 to 1945, a total of 13 million Jews and others who were unable to defend themselves were rounded up and exterminated.
    ———————–
    China established gun control in 1935: From 1948 to

    1952, 20 million political dissidents, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    ———————–
    Guatemala established gun control in 1964:

    From 1964 to 1981, 100,000 Mayan Indians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    ———————–
    Uganda established gun control in 1970:

    From 1971 to 1979, 300,000 Christians, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    ———————–
    Cambodia established gun control in 1956:

    From 1975 to 1977, one million educated people, unable to defend themselves, were rounded up and exterminated.
    ———————–
    56 million defenseless people were rounded up and exterminated in the 20th Century because of gun control.
    ———————–
    You won’t see this data on the US evening news, or hear politicians disseminating this information.

    Guns in the hands of honest citizens save lives and property and, yes, gun-control laws adversely affect only the law-abiding citizens.

    With guns, we are ‘citizens’; without them, we are ‘subjects’.

    During WW II, the Japanese decided not to invade America because they knew most Americans were ARMED!

    Gun owners in the USA are the largest armed forces in the World!

    If you value your freedom, please spread this anti-gun control message to all of your friends.

    The purpose of fighting is to win. There is no possible victory in defense.

    The sword is more important than the shield and skill is more important than either.

    SWITZERLANDISSUES A GUN TO EVERY HOUSEHOLD! SWITZERLAND’S GOVERNMENT ISSUES AND TRAINS EVERY ADULT IN THE USE OF A RIFLE.

    SWITZERLANDHAS THE LOWEST GUN RELATED CRIME RATE OF ANY CIVILIZED COUNTRY IN THE WORLD!!!

    IT’S A NO BRAINER! DON’T LET OUR GOVERNMENT WASTE MILLIONS OF OUR TAX DOLLARS IN AN EFFORT TO MAKE ALL LAW-ABIDING CITIZENS AN EASY TARGET.

    I’m a firm believer in the 2nd Amendment! If you are too, please forward this. If you’re not a believer, please reconsider the true facts.
    This is history; not what’s being shown on TV, sanctioned by our illustrious delusional leaders in Washington.

    Copy and Paste this on Facebook to let the facts be heard!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s