Super-injunctions, Twitter and Gagging the Press (and bloggers)

One has to ask what’s the big difference between a journalist being paid to write for The Mainstream Press and bloggers writing because it pleases them.

This question arises particularly when I read here:

Most recently, there was a piece in the “Independent” claiming that, over the past 5 years, “333 gagging orders protecting the identities of celebrities, children and private individuals have been granted in the past five years“. 

However, 264 of these orders related to children and vulnerable adults and only 69 were injunctions which barred the publication of the names of high-profile individuals – that is, 14 a year or just slightly more than one a month.

Remember that I have been gagged by two Councils from sharing details about their cases of snatching children from their parents.

First they commit crimes. Then the get the judiciary to sanction their crimes. And then the victims and anybody who wants to help are being prevented from screaming. Long live ‘law and order’!!!

Advertisements

About Sabine Kurjo McNeill

I'm a mathematician and system analyst formerly at CERN in Geneva and became an event organiser, software designer, independent web publisher and online promoter of Open Justice. My most significant scientific contribution is www.smartknowledge.space
This entry was posted in Campaigning, Family Courts, From Mainstream Media, John Hemming MP, News and tagged , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s